C#中的异步“任务”结果代码流与JavaScript(或TypeScript)

Asynchronous “Task” Result Code Flow in C# vs JavaScript (or TypeScript)

来源: link 标签:javascriptc#typescript 更新时间:

  问题

作为一般的软件概念,一些异步操作可以采用三种不同的“路径”:

  1. 操作成功,我们继续执行
  2. 操作失败,系统抛出异常
  3. 该操作由系统(超时)或用户交互取消

在C#中,我们可以处理这3个不同的“路径”,如下所示: 

 try
{
    await myService.doAsync();
}
catch(TaskCanceledException ex)
{
   // Here, we know that somehow the Task was cancelled. Whether that is caused by something like
   // a timeout or a user explicitly performed some operation to cancel the Task
   // This might be apart of some actual business logic and so I want to handle it differently than
   // a general exception
}
catch(Exception ex)
{
    // This means something went wrong in the downstream code and I probably
    // want to log an error and do something else or 'throw' again so upstream 
    // execution can handle the failure as well
}

但是,尝试在JavaScript或TypeScript中执行此操作并不像我看到的那样优雅,因为我们没有能力检查类型,这意味着我们也无法像我们可以在C#中级联catch块: 

 try
{
    await myService.doAsync();
}
catch(e)
{
    if(e instanceof TaskCancelledError) {
        // Here, we know that somehow the Task was cancelled. Whether that is caused by something like
        // a timeout or a user explicitly performed some operation to cancel the Task
        // This might be apart of some actual business logic and so I want to handle it differently than
        // a general exception
    }else{
        // This means something went wrong in the downstream code and I probably
        // want to log an error and do something else or 'throw' again so upstream 
        // execution can handle the failure as well
    }
}

class TaskCancelledError extends Error {
    constructor() {
        super("The task was cancelled");
    }
}

我在上面阐述的是实现TypeScript(JavaScript)和C#之间功能平等的唯一方法吗?我可以做到这一点,但它只是感觉有点hacky.

作为一个旁注,是否可以更改TypeScript来支持这种catch块的结构,但TS将编译成我们上面看到的代码?

  最佳答案

您是正确的.这是在Javascript和Typescript中捕获特定类型异常的正确方法.

C#有一个宽泛的标准库,支持取消令牌并一致使用TaskCanceledException.TypeScript没有.必须跟踪这些CancellationTokens,它是一个公平的工作量.许多TypeScript异步原语(例如间隔,获取,xhr等)支持某种abort / exceledException,但他们都以不同的方式执行它,他们并不总是抛出.

可以更改TypeScript来支持这个,但我认为不会发生这种情况.有人讨论了here 和here 坏,他们选择不支持这个功能.

  相同标签的其他问题

javascriptc#typescript
上一个问题:
下一个问题: